Archive for the ‘Nutjobs’ Category

Is Ron Paul Finally Giving Up?

February 9, 2008

Ron Paul Straight JacketPerhaps Ron Paul is finally facing reality.  He has no chance whatsoever at the Republican nomination let alone the Presidency.  It would appear that the good doctor has decided to pursue a more realistic goal: saving his congressional seat.  Good plan, Ron!

Just as the liberal Ohio congressman [Dennis Kookspinach] realized last month that his long-shot presidential campaign was imperiling his prospects for keeping his House seat, Paul appears to be choosing the comfort of incumbency over a continued effort to win a nomination that he has virtually no shot at capturing.

In Ron Paul’s own words:

“I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen.”

And you Paultards can forget about a third party run (and a huge defeat).  That’s just a pipe dream.  In the pied piper’s own words:

“Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican Party, so there will be no third-party run,” Paul said.  “I do not denigrate third parties — just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.”

Bye bye, Ron Paul.  It’s been fun.  Thanks for keeping the race interesting, but you never really had a chance.  America does not want to cut and run.  Republicans do not want to cut and run.  Maybe you should have run for the Democrat party nomination.  You’d have had a better chance in the kook party.

— Psycheout

Coral Reefs Are Satanic Plots

February 4, 2008

CoralYoung Earth Science (true science) is making remarkable progress on a number of fronts. I have yet to see them attack this, however:

We have sourced the latest information avaliable on the age of the Great Barrier Reef. Stay tuned though, because we’re expecting this information to change as more research is undertaken.

These are the significant dates you should be talking about when you explain the age of the Great Barrier Reef:

  • While corals have existed on the Great Barrier Reef for as long as 25 million years, they didn’t form large reef structures like those we see today.
  • The earliest record we have of complete reef structures (like those we see today) is from 600000 years ago.
  • The current Great Barrier structure started growing on top of the old reef platform about 9000 years ago when the sea levels rose at the end of the last Ice Age.

Many of the places that support reefs today were part of the land during the last ice age, which ended about 20000 years ago.

As global temperatures increased, the ice melted and retreated to the poles and mountain tops. Sea levels rose to their present levels about 6000 years ago, creating ideal conditions for corals to develop along the tops of former low coastal hills.

The Great Barrier Reef comprises about 2900 seperate reefs off the coasts of the islands and the mainland, and barrier reefs facing the sea. The outer Reef lies along the edge of the Australian continental shelf.

Turtles and sharks are the marine ‘dinosaurs’ of the Reef. Turtles have been swimming around in its waters for 150 million years, while sharks have been around for about 400 million years _ that’s 100 times longer than humans.

Coral ReefNow I am not a qualified YEC scientist, but even I can see that these ‘coral reefs’ are about as phony as can be. James Ussher accurately _ and biblically _ calculated the following dates:

  • 4004 BC – Creation.
  • 2348 BC – The Great Flood.
  • 1921 BC – God’s call to Abraham.
  • 1491 BC – The Exodus from Egypt.
  • 1012 BC – The founding of the Temple in Jerusalem.
  • 586 BC – The destruction of Jerusalem by Babylon and the beginning of the Babylonian Captivity.
  • 4 BC – The birth of Jesus.

This all sounds right to me. But the moonbat Australian government, which calls its birds ‘boobies’, is determined to destroy the faith of billions of Christians around the world with these ‘coral reefs’. When they are presented in the MSM or by some Darwinist college professor, we can easily see through their lives, but an innocent and brainwashed park ranger is much more convincing. Just take a look at a picture of this ‘brain coral’:

Brain coral 2.jpgThe photo looks convincing at first glance. There is no possible way this photo could have been photoshopped. However, the carvings appear too precise and too simple to be made by the LORD. The LORD does not make simple designs. It is obvious that these Darwinists took a bunch of colored rocks and embed them with tiny jacks so that they could expand slowly but surely. The idea that several small organisms formed these ‘coral reefs’ is utterly ridiculous.

Fiji MermaidWhat can you, the average citizen, do to stop this elaborate hoax on par with P.T. Barnum? (Update by Psycheout: Remember the Fiji Mermaid, pictured at right?) One thing you can do is to simply swim around the reef and start bashing it to pieces in areas where the Australian government can’t see it. A far better plan, however, is to get King Brownback to petition the Australian government to demolish these phony organisms. One can only hope that the Darwinists, losing one of their main ‘trumps’ (ha!), will be demoralized and will stop persecuting true scientists like Ben Stein. Then, we can begin the slow, painful process of not only taking back America, but making sure that ‘science’ no longer can even dream of making phony theories.

— Bob Corker

Ralph Nader To the Rescue?

January 30, 2008

Ralph NaderWith the departure of Kookspinach and Silky Pony, there is a void in the ultra far left kook wing of the Democrat party. Ralph Nader sees his chance to once again play the “progressive” spoiler. Republicans should open up their wallets again and support him. He’s just what we need to assure a Huckabee or McCain victory. With wackjob Nader in the race, perhaps even the stomach turning empty suit Mittens Romney might have a chance if he somehow buys the GOP nomination. But admittedly that would be the worst case scenario.

Ralph Nader has formed a presidential exploratory committee, and said in an interview Wednesday that he will launch another presidential bid if he’s convinced he can raise enough money to appear on the vast majority of state ballots this fall.

With both Ralph Nader and Ron Paul siphoning the anti-war and uber-kook vote from the leftist candidate, even our weakest candidate could win.

Nader, who ran as an independent candidate in each of the past three presidential elections, told ABCNews.com that he will run in 2008 if he is convinced over the next month that he would be able to raise $10 million over the course of the campaign — and attract enough lawyers willing to work free of charge to get his name on state ballots.

There’s a website already set up. Perhaps if enough Republicans pledge to donate funds or legal assistance, the old goat will be convinced to run again, ensuring a Republican in the White House in 2008. It just might be worth it.

Nader said he filed papers with the Federal Election Commission and launched a Web site after Dennis Kucinich, a liberal Ohio congressman, announced his decision to withdraw from the presidential race last week.

He was set to announce that he had formed an exploratory committee Wednesday, even before former Sen. John Edwards made it known that he’d be ending his candidacy.

Listen to this kook! Size up his enormous ego! This is awesome:

“When Kucinich threw in the towel, now you have Edwards gone — who’s going to carry the torch of democratic populism against the relentless domination of powerful corporations of our government?”

Why, Ralph Nader, super kook of course! He hasn’t let us down the last two election cycles. Why not help us out for a third?

This might be the best news of the campaign season. Run, Ralph, Run!

See also: Hot Air.

WordPress Political Blog Alliance
WordPress.com
Political Blogger Alliance

— Psycheout

Clown Candidate Ron Paul Excluded from Debates

January 1, 2008

Ron Paul Jefferson, or Napoleon?All I can say is that it’s about time. Ron Paul is a laughable joke of a candidate. He’s fine in the Congress where his nuttiness is diluted by saner voices. But President Ron Paul? Pardon me while I snigger.

ABC and Fox News Channel are narrowing the field of presidential candidates invited to debates this weekend just before the New Hampshire primary, in Fox’s case infuriating supporters of Republican Rep. Ron Paul.

Ron Paul supporters are as thin skinned and unhinged as they come. So excuse me while I pop some popcorn and enjoy the show of Paultards heads exploding. Bwahahahahaha!

Fox News says it has limited space in its studio, which leaves Rep. Ron Paul out of a weekend debate.

In other words, we’ve run out of room for crazy people. Sorry Ron Nutjob.

The roster of participants for ABC’s back-to-back, prime-time Republican and Democratic debates Saturday in New Hampshire will be determined after results of Thursday’s Iowa caucus become clear.

Once Ron Paul goes nowhere, he will appear nowhere. Thank the Lord. He’s a catastrophe. This nutball is clearly going nowhere but the looney bin. He may be a doctor, but he apparently needs to see a doctor, stat. A head shrinker.

Perhaps Ron Paul’s supporters make a good case for socialist health care. Mental health care. They seriously need to be locked up where they won’t do harm to themselves and others.

Ron Paul Jefferson? Or Napoleon? Either way, this unhinged slobbering moonbat needs to be locked up.

Update: Over at Balloon Juice, Mike D. sheds a bitter tear on behalf of his libertarian boy toy.  That’s understandable, since he’s a total nutjob.  Perverts of a feather flock together.

— Psycheout

Long-Haired Men Are the Anti-Christs

December 24, 2007

A Dirty HippieWhat with the foolish amounts of hippies that are trying to appear ‘cool’ so that you might let them fornicate with your children, we can hardly risk letting our children out of our sight these days.

What we conservatives aren’t often noticing is that hippies are just a mere subculture of the great symbol of anti-conservatism, long hair on men. Liberals love symbolism; they use it to brainwash the school boards into allowing their foolish books to poison our children’s minds.

I think that there can be no greater threat to America than this deeply rooted hairstyle. And here it says that “long hair frequently shows less sexual control”; no wonder hippies are the worst part of our society. Although much of the site is meaningless whining over why they feel hair is ‘important’, I feel they are correct on this statement.

Another Hippie

It is worth mentioning that the Bible understood the threat very well. 1 Corinthians 11:14 : Doth not even nature teach you that it is shameful for a man to have long hair? The weirdos are undoubtedly going to argue that the Nazarites could take a vow to God by not cutting their hair. True to their traditions of quote mining, however, they will not know a single thing about the story of Samson and Delilah.

As conservatives know, Delilah invoked her typical woman’s deception on Samson by tempting him into breaking his vow. Blinded by the Philistines, Samson had not lost all faith with God, so he managed to kill his captors. However, the strongest man in the world had been betrayed by his hair and his woman.

It is fitting that God now requires women to cover their heads with hair: 1 Corinthians 11:16 for her hair is given to her as a covering… It is to be a transvestite for a man to adopt woman’s dress styles, but it must be a mental disorder to adopt a woman’s shame.

Not only that, the traitorous Abasalom must have had lots of hair upon his head: 2 Samuel 14:26 : And when he polled his head… he weighed the hair of his head at two hundred shekels after the king’s weight. God clearly does not want men to have long hair.

More Hippies

But the hippies, injuns, and whatnots have been subtly planning the overthrow of Jesus, first by starting an utter lie about whether Jesus agreed with their foolish ideas or not. They have now turned the commonly marketed Jesus into a symbol of their shameful ways. The Prince of Peace was no hippy.

Any right-thinking person can see the evils in hippy society: they give little babies marijuana, they fornicate with doorknobs, they waste half their life at rock concerts, and encourage shameful Asian religions. What we are not noticing is their slow spread into other cultures.

A Hippie Infestation

The premier place for these sinners to gather is at the Long Hair Hyperboard, where these sad pathetic whelps long for the next 10 years to be ‘skipped’ just so they can have dead protein hanging down to their shoulders. Longhairs often hang out at rock concerts, Harley-Davidson fanclub bars, and environmentalist rallies.

Long hair has become a symbol of just about every sector on the left. Hopefully, we can pass a law requiring all of these men’s heads to be sheered so that no hair grows past the ears or touches the collar. Long hair is anti-American, plain and simple.

— Bob Corker

Deranged Clinton Fan Takes Hostages, Begs for Help, Surrenders

November 30, 2007

UnhingedNow that it’s all over and ended without any bloodshed or injuries, the strange tale of what happened at Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign headquarters can at last be told. In a bizarre display of unhinged moonbattery, a deranged Clinton fan and advocate for universal (socialized) health care and a perfect representative of the today’s average leftist, marched into Clinton’s campaign offices with a bomb strapped to his chest demanding to speak with the lady Senator and Democrat party Presidential candidate. Yikes. At first I thought it might have been Mike Stark, professional stalker for the nutroots.

And what did this fervent Clinton admirer want from the lady Senator from New York? Health care! Specifically, mental health care! Considering how nutty Clinton and her husband are, this young man was obviously barking up the wrong tree. Or he was just barking. Barking mad.

When Hillary failed to show up in a nurse’s outfit to tend to the mad bomber’s mental health problems (probably rooted in liberalism), he started taking hostages. This is ironic, since that’s exactly what HillaryCare would do to American taxpayers, but I digress. After a tense six hour wait, a blink of the eye compared to the waiting period to see a doctor under socialized medicine, the poor fellow got tired of waiting, maybe even realizing how horrific it would be to actually meet Hillary face to face, and he peacefully surrendered.

All in all, a happy end to a rather tense day. But there’s more to this story than a crazy person taking people hostage and making unreasonable demands. Much more. And this incident is a perfect illustration with what’s been going wrong in our country. Specifically with the disloyal opposition.

This is what happens when liberals don’t get their way. They obsess, hate, think crazy thoughts, and eventually strap a bomb to their chests (literally or figuratively), demand that everyone pays attention to them while they scream their unreasonable and confused demands intermixed with leftist talking points, and finally, in the end, they give up when confronted with reality. Well sometimes. At least this time everything ended with nobody getting hurt. But what about the next time a liberal timebomb goes off?

Actually Hilldog herself, no stranger to mental illness, summed it up the best:

It appears he was someone who needed help and sought attention in absolutely the wrong way,” she said.

And that, my friends, is liberalism in a nutshell.

So it shall be forever written that on November 30th, 2007, a perfectly encapsulated microcosm of the liberal mind and leftist behavior manifested itself in simple terms that the entire world could understand.

And some people claim there’s no G-d. Here’s your proof, skeptics.

For a more detailed blow-by-blow accounting of today’s Clinton crisis, you can’t do much better than Hot Air and Michelle Malkin.

Final Thought: This would obviously never happen to the GOP.  Packing heat has its advantages.

— Psycheout

Jonah Goldberg Heaps Praise on Ron Paul

November 20, 2007

Ron Paul Revolution?I must say that this was a bit of a surprise. With most sensible people speaking out against or ignoring the long shot Ron Paul campaign, Jonah comes in and puts it all in perspective. From the LA Times:

As the hopeless but energetic presidential campaign of Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) builds momentum in name recognition, fundraising and cross-ideology appeal, media conservatives are beginning to attack Paul in earnest.

I don’t know about that characterization. It seems some in the media realize that they finally have to pay some marginal attention to the little fella. So now they’re reporting the truth about the man, his record, the precarious cliff he’d like to lead us off of, and how eager his lemming followers are to take that giant leap. If reporting the facts about Ron Paul is an attack, well, so be it.

Republican consultant David Hill condemns the candidate’s “increasingly leftish” positions. Syndicated columnist Mona Charen calls Paul “too cozy with kooks and conspiracy theorists.” Film critic and talk radio host Michael Medved looks over Paul’s supporters and finds “an imposing collection of neo-Nazis, white Supremacists, Holocaust deniers, 9/11 ‘truthers’ and other paranoid and discredited conspiracists.”

But other than that, Ron Paul’s super awesome! Nice job, Jonah. Now we all feel much better. But he goes farther:

(more…)

Stormfront Hearts Ron Paul

October 23, 2007

Stormfront Logo FullosseousFlap has noticed something that I pointed out a couple of months ago. Stormfront, the infamous “white power” site, just loves Ron Paul.

Why does Congressman Ron Paul have campaign ads on a White Nationalist Neo-Nazi Bulletin Board (stormfront.org) which is listed as a hate site?

Good question. They hate neocons (code word for the “global Zionist menace”) and Jews in general. Keep in mind that whenever someone says “neocon,” they really mean “dirty Jew.”

Ron Paul Stormfront AdYou’ll find ads for Ron Paul on the aforementioned hate site, pictured at right (click the image for a larger view). Is the Ron Paul campaign or its surrogates buying ad space on Stormfront? It certainly will be good for fundraising, but is it good for his already tainted public image?

From the Ron Paul supporters I have encountered, a fervent and annoying group of crazies, this probably won’t affect how they view Ron Paul; he is their savior who will fight the neocon Jew menace, cut and run from Iraq and defund the Federal government. Calls to abolish the Federal Reserve and retreat into isolationism and to surrender the War on Terror to the Islamofascists receive unquestioning and loud and extended cheers from his adoring fans. The Borg is alive and well.

They, like their brothers in arms, the Stormfronters, are ideological purists. The quintessential true believers. Ron Paul could eat a live kitten on television and they would cheer his name. Wackjobs, nutters and truthers.

Flap lays out a challenge for Doctor Paul:

All of the GOP candidates should DEMAND that Paul REPUDIATES this site, pulls his ad and returns any money contributed by these Neo-Nazis.

And, Flap has a question for Ron Paul: Are you an anti-Semite, sir?

Paul certainly speaks their language. Is he pandering or is he one of them? The answer is clearly yes and yes.

Stormfront is behind the Ron Paul Revolution. David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the KKK, is a fan and has endorsed Ron Paul. Are you willing to stand with them? If so, you stand alone. Stand over there.

Hat Tip: Hot Air.

Update: Over at Red State, Mark Kilmer points out that Ron Paul does not belong in the race for the GOP nomination and Leon Wolf wisely slams the door on Paulunatics noting that life is not fair.

Update 2: The Lone Star Times has asked the Ron Paul campaign some good questions. The response thus far? Crickets.

But I do, however, think it is perfectly reasonable to ask him to speak out officially and demand the Nazis and all other racist groups remove these links, and insist unambiguously that he doesn’t want the support, either financial or in the form of votes, of any white supremacist.

Do the right (or is that white) thing, Doctor No. Stormfront, Vanguard and White World News readers aren’t your base, are they?

Exit Question: Does Ron Paul listen to Prussian Blue?

Sully PoohUpdate 3: Sully Pooh, the consummate concern troll, cleverly pretends not to understand Red State’s no Paultard policy.  After quoting Leon Wolf, Andy winks coyly and asks:

Frightened much?

More like sick of Paultard spam.  Of course Sully’s was a rhetorical question.  He doesn’t allow comments from anybody, not even those poor oppressed Ronulans.  What’s the matter, Mr. Sullivan?  Are you chicken, much?

— Psycheout