Take That, ACLU!


No ACLUThe worthless far-left secular progressive gang of nuts and kooks at the ACLU have rightfully been slapped down by the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court dealt a setback Tuesday to civil rights America haters and privacy advocates terrorist coddlers who oppose the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping terrorist surveillance program.

[Corrected for truth.]

A federal judge correctly pointed out that one must have proof before going ahead with a broad fishing expedition of a lawsuit that harms America’s security. The ACLU had none. In its aggressive BDS driven zeal to blame America first, the moonbats forgot to actually gather evidence to support their nonsense.

A federal judge in Detroit largely agreed, but the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the suit, saying the plaintiffs could not prove their communications had been monitored and thus could not prove they had been harmed by the program.

It was the only thing that the 6th Circuit Court could do. No proof, no suit. No harm, no foul.

The government has refused to turn over information about the closely guarded program that could reveal who has been under surveillance.

Only an imbecile would reveal to criminal terrorists that they are under surveillance. The ACLU would have us give preference to evildoers and cripple the United States from performing its sworn duty to protect Americans. That could not be allowed to happen.

It will be a good day indeed when the ACLU is put in its proper place: the ash heap of history.

Update: Karl, over at Protein Wisdom, has also noticed the shoddy, biased reporting on this story:

The Associated Press misreports:

The Supreme Court rejected a challenge Tuesday to the Bush administration’s domestic spying program.

The bias here is blatant, insofar as the Terrorist Surveillance Program involves international communications and there is no evidence that US persons have ever been targeted by the program without a warrant.

Nice catch, Karl.  I couldn’t agree more.

— Psycheout



3 Responses to “Take That, ACLU!”

  1. jack fate Says:

    Are you kidding? “Corrected for truth”? Did I miss the part where the Bill of Rights was rescinded? More specifically, the Fourth Amendment? That’s some balls. Ignorant and in-denial of the real world and the real laws which govern this society, but balls, none-the-less.

    You’re going to be a pathetic joke when you, all of the sudden, regain your lost love for Constitutional principles and mandates once your Authoritarian Power Worshiping Daddy Party loses the White House. Don’t think it won’t go unnoticed.

    On the flip slide, should the utterly clueless and proto-authoritarian McCain win, I’m sure you’ll be more than willing kneel in fealty before the powerful. Don’t forget, just because you choose to be ignorant and submissive, doesn’t make you any less ignorant and submissive.

    The cognitive dissonance would be funny, if you weren’t being so serious. But what’s to be expected from a political ideology that celebrates anti-intellectualism and rewards practical failure as long as the requisite loyal submission was observed.

    In short, while I do enjoy reading your blog, even though I don’t agree with much of what you type, this whole post has to be the stupidest thing you’ve ever “corrected.” Please, stay in your imagined reality, you’ll do us less damage there.

  2. jack fate Says:

    Only an imbecile would reveal to criminal terrorists that they are under surveillance.

    Only an imbecile would think that any group openly hostile to the country with the largest intelligence gathering machine on the planet is not aware that they probably are being watched by said country. Seriously, your reasoning is straight outta 1984.

  3. ralfast Says:

    Of course, this is all circular logic based on false assumptions:

    A) That the goverment (at least this goverment, guess what will happen if there is a Dem in charge!) can never, EVER, do anything wrong in the pursuit of terrorist.

    B) That only terrorist (which are designated by said goverment in the first place, in secret) will be the target of said surveillance, ignoring all evidence to the contrary.

    C) That evidence can be procured when the goverment keeps it all secret in the first place. You must prove harm…but you can’t know if there is harm because its secret, therefore you can’t prove it.

    D)That the State equal the Nation. That somehow opposing or even questioning a given goverment or even the State is an attack on the people or the Nation. The two are not the same.

    E) That a goverment with such a poor record on everything needs more powers to invade our privacy when they fail to use the power they already had in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: